Jonathan Lowe

Call 2008

lowe@exchangechambers.co.uk

Photo of Jonathan Lowe

Insurance

For eight years Jonathan was head of the Commercial Insurance Litigation department at the leading insurance firm, Keoghs. Whilst there he was responsible for a caseload of high value policy dispute litigation, defence actions on behalf of policyholders and subrogated recovery actions on behalf of liability or property insurers. From 2005 he was recognised as a leading practitioner in the field by both The Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners.

Handles all aspects of insurance litigation including the following:

  • Policy coverage disputes including employers’ liability, public liability, contractors’ liability, motor and professional indemnity policy coverage disputes;
  • Disputes concerning the application of policy terms and avoidance of policies;
  • A broad range of subrogated actions arising from property damage, including defending such actions;
  • Co-insurance disputes
  • Actions involving the professional negligence of insurance intermediaries
  • Actions for declaration proceedings under s 152 of the Road Traffic Act 1988

Insurance Cases

SELECTED CONCLUDED CASES

As a Solicitor:

Rexodan International Ltd v Commercial Union Assurance Co plc [1999] Lloyd’s Rep IR 495 – interpretation of condition precedent in an insurance policy

Patrick v Royal London Assurance (2006) 1 CLC 576 – interpretation and application of the word “wilful” in an exclusion clause in an insurance policy

John Reilly v National Insurance and Guarantee Corporation Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1460 – application of an exclusion clause in a liability policy

Examples of cases conducted as a Barrister:

Advice on insurance policy coverage following refusal of an indemnity, potential proceedings against insurance brokers and in relation to a claim against owners of a neighbouring property following a catastrophic building collapse

Advising in relation to a professional negligence claim against Lloyds brokers following a refusal by the Lloyds syndicate to indemnify under an insurance policy following a building fire.

Advising in relation to policy coverage following a claim by an injured claimant against the purported occupier of premises/purported policyholder

Advising insurers in subrogated recovery proceedings against a contractor following injury caused to a visitor to the policyholder’s premises

Defending a contractor following a fire in a thatched roof

Successfully securing a full indemnity for a policyholder after a refusal of indemnity following a catastrophic fire at the family home.

SELECTED ONGOING CASES

Representing a policyholder in a claim for an indemnity under a contractors’ all risk policy following a fire at a building.  Indemnity has been refused for breach of a fire-precautions condition.

Representing insurers in various subrogated recovery proceedings including a claim arising from flooding caused following an under-floor pipe burst, from subsidence damage caused to the policyholder’s home, and an action against a contractor arising from water damage caused to computer equipment

Representing insurers being sued by a policyholder for an indemnity under a household insurance policy following damage caused by subsidence

Representing a policyholder in circumstances where a claim for fire damage to a commercial vehicle has been refused for breach of conditions.