Gerard Martin QC

Call 1978
Silk 2000

"He is massively experienced, unflappable and calm."

Chambers and Partners 2022
Photo of Gerard Martin QC

Court of Protection

Gerard has a nationwide practice handling catastrophic injury claims of complexity and high value and has a particular expertise in brain injury litigation. He has specialised in high value cases since 1993, and over the last 10 years the majority of his caseload has been in acquired brain injury cases of the utmost severity. His work is almost entirely instructed on behalf of claimants.

He has spoken on capacity issues at local and national seminars. His professional and non-professional role as the former chair of trustees of a childrens’ hospice has given him a real insight into many issues often associated with Court of Protection matters.

Gerard welcomes direct approaches to discuss potential cases and is always ready to meet the client at their home. He is a former Recorder of both the Crown and County Courts having resigned that position in order to concentrate on advocating on behalf of clients.

His practice has long involved him dealing with brain injury and the linked capacity issues that inevitably arise in such cases. He is familiar with the challenges that cognitive deficits cause to both the client and their family. His approach is to listen to, understand, and make time for the client and their family in order to communicate their thoughts and wishes. This level of attention and care, along with a proven track record in getting his clients the best outcome possible under the circumstances, are two of the key reasons he is in such demand and remains so valued by his clients.



Guantanamo Bay Negotiations 2010

Acted for two of the inmates in a two week mediation against five Government departments seeking compensation for human rights violations, successfully settled.

AB 2010

Severe brain injury to a 60 year old passenger in a car, £7.5 million recovered, including annual payments for care and case management of £310,000.


Severe brain injury for a passenger exiting a moving taxi- successfully recovered


EF 2011

Spinal injury tetraplegic in his early twenties, complicated by his failure to use care package, £7.3 million.

GH 2010

Young man of 16 at time of severe brain injury, passenger in car driven off Beachey Head, management of his care team made difficult by his amorous relationship with one of his carers, just under £6 million recovered.

IJ 2011

Chronic pain case for a man in his twenties, video surveillance and credibility in issue, settled for £535.000.

KL 2012

A lady in her fifties, amputee, loss of upper limb, just below shoulder, issues re use of myo electric prosthetics – £1.15 million recovered.

OP 2011

Turkish speaking man in his fifties, severe brain damage, unable to walk by reason of neurological injuries, lost ability to speak English, severely distressed by his injuries, complicated by boney growths around his knees causing pain, £5.5 million recovered.

QR 2012

Young lady in her twenties, severe brain injuries, rendered virtually blind, 3% sight remaining in one eye, severe anxiety problems, case complicated because we were the second legal team, called in to take over the case from solicitors with whom the family had become dissatisfied, very difficult care package to manage, £5.5 million recovered.

MN 2012

Lady in her fifties, suffers severe brain injury, as a result suffers the onset of bipolar disorder, a diagnosis agreed by Defence expert to be caused by accident. The disorder not yet controlled by medication. Has reverted to her first language of Sri Lankan, profoundly deaf

B 2018

Case settled with two days to go before trial on liability, tertraparetic client having fallen downstairs at home and broken her neck, fracture missed at hospital. Case required tough negotiation and sensitive handling of client and her expectations. We settled at 50% of full liability

H 2018

Paraplegic case just settled for £3.3 m, good negotiated settlement and client managed well.

International cases

Two recent cases of interest both concern the management of cases abroad. One involves a man in his sixties, living in Tehran, who suffered what we believe to be a severe brain injury when knocked down as a pedestrian in London and the brain injury was missed by the treating hospital which focussed on the orthopaedic injuries. The client speaks no English.

The other is for a young man with a severe brain injury who resides in Kuwait City, little is known as yet what systems for rehabilitation exist in his home country. Little English is spoken and reliance upon interpreters is essential.