Back to Bill Braithwaite's home pageBack to Articles IndexNext Article

M. W. v MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

SETTLEMENT REPORT



Very severe brain damage caused by negligent shooting
Settlement of the quantum claim at £1,150,000


The figures below are based on the Claimant's Schedule of Loss, modified to take account of the risk of litigation. None of the figures were approved or agreed by the Defendants.

GENERAL MATTERS

Accident date 1992

Claimant's date of birth: 1971

Age then: 20 years

Age now: 29 years

Date of medical discharge: 1993

Discharge but for accident: 2001

Writ issued: 1995

Judgment: 1999

Trial date: 2001


PAIN, SUFFERING AND LOSS OF AMENITIES

1. The Claimant was shot in the head and suffered severe brain injury. The functions of the brain affected included control of the left limbs, sensation to the left side of the face and left hand, and cognitive functions including frontal lobe functions such as concentration, control of emotions, decision making, and judgment. The Claimant suffered impairment of memory and learning. It is probable that the Claimant experienced a focal epileptic attack in early 1993 when he fell through a kitchen window. The Claimant is prone to mood swings. He is to be regarded as a Patient. He experiences tinnitus in both ears and has impaired hearing. The Claimant needs a high level of care and attention. The Claimant has been left with very significant residual disabilities and they will continue to have a substantial negative impact on his daily life. Even with a considerable degree of supervision and support, given the Claimant's disabilities and problems, he will have extreme difficulty in maintaining continuous employment, even on a voluntary basis. It is unlikely the Claimant will be able to hold down any sort of paid work. For all practical purposes, the Claimant should be regarded as unemployable. These were injuries of the utmost severity.


Pain and suffering inclusive of interest £100,000

PAST LOSSES

EARNINGS

2. But for the accident, the Claimant would have served 12 years in the Army, reaching the rank of Corporal as set out in the Defendant's own career forecast.

Projected earnings to the 8th October 2001 £91,221.00

Less estimated net earnings £ 2,500.00

Total past loss of earnings £88,721

ARMY BENEFITS

3. As a single man in the Army, the Claimant's living expenses (housing, clothing, food and household services) would have been substantially lower than in civilian life. Civilian life costs were calculated via the Family Expenditure Survey.

Total claim £28,807

CARE

4. The Claimant claimed the costs of past professional care provided by various different agencies.

Total claim £50,433

CASE MANAGEMENT

5. The Claimant claimed past case management costs.

Total claim £65,051

INCREASED ACCOMMODATION

6. The Claimant claimed increased accommodation costs based upon housing costs for one man taken from the Family Expenditure Survey and comparing the same with actual rental costs incurred.

Actual housing costs £25,927

Costs incurred in any case (£11,654)

Leicestershire moving costs £ 1,341

Public Trust Office initial fee £ 100

Total £15,714

TOTAL PAST LOSSES

7. Therefore, the Claimant's total past losses to trial amounted to £248,726

INTEREST

8. The Claimant claimed interest at one half of the special investment account rates applicable to the 8th October 2001 and calculated at 30.89%.

Total interest charges amounted to £76,831

Credit was given for interest on interim payments actually received.

FUTURE LOSSES

EARNINGS

9. The Claimant's Army career would have ended at the 1st December 2001. His civilian future loss of earnings was claimed by taking the average of gross earnings from 3 careers as advised by employment consultants.

(a) Future loss of earnings between the 9th October 2001 and the 5th April 2002 were claimed in the sum of £8,064

(c) Therefore, the Claimant's total claim for future loss of earnings amounted to £412,308



CARE

Case management

10. Case Management costs were claimed at £320,259



Neuropsychology

11. Costs were claimed at 2 sessions pa (£600) plus travel (£100) and clinical supervision advice and training (£3,600). Therefore, neuropsychology costs amounted to £4,300 pa at a multiplier of 28.2 - £121,260

Support work

12. Costs of professional care were claimed at £236,796

Driving costs

13. £6,785

14. Therefore, total costs of future care amounted to £685,100

PENSION BENEFITS

15. Loss of resettlement grant £5,508.00

Loss of terminal grant £4,824.00

Loss of annual pension £6,794.00

TOTAL £17,126

MISCELLANEOUS COSTS

16. The Claimant cannot perform works of internal or external maintenance, DIY etc. He claimed, say, £750pa at a reduced multiplier of 24 - £18,000

COURT OF PROTECTION/RECEIVER'S COSTS

17. (i) Annual administration fee for Court of Protection at £205.00 at a multiplier of 28.2 - £5,781

(ii) Professional receivers fees at an annual cost of £3,525 together with an annual cost of accountancy assistance at £823 (£4,348) at a multiplier of 28.2 - £122,614

TOTAL £128,395



SUMMARY

Past loss of earnings £88,721

Past Army benefits £28,807

Past care £50,433

Past case management £65,051

Increased accommodation £15,714

Interest £76,831

Future earnings £412,308

Future case management £320,259

Neuropsychology £121,260

Future professional care £236,796

Driving test/car £6,785

Pension benefits £17,126

Miscellaneous costs £18,000

Court of protection/receivers costs £128,395



BILL BRAITHWAITE Q.C. and GERARD MARTIN Q.C. were instructed by Lesley Casey of Donns, Manchester.

 

****
Back to Bill Braithwaite's home pageBack to Articles IndexNext Article