Back to Bill Braithwaite's home pageBack to Case Settlements IndexNext Case Settlement

ANDREW PAUL W***
(by his Litigation Friend, R*** K*** P***)

and

S*** SPECIAL METALS LIMITED


SETTLEMENT REPORT

Severe brain damage; settlement at £2 million

Assessment of the provision of future care

1. Mr Andrew W*** was born in July 1969 and so was 25 at the date of the accident on the 29th September 1994. He was 30 at the date of settlement, his case having been listed for trial on the 6th June 2000.

2. The injury was a subdural haematoma causing right sided hemiplegia persisting as hemiparesis; epilepsy; recurrent deep vein thromboses; and reduced acuity in left eye. Reduction in life expectancy to age 65 years. Judgement: 19.4.96. Pre-accident job: Dismantling engineer for the Defendants, working on sub-contract to BT.

3. The Defendants offered £1.85 million, which we told them we would advise our client to reject. The following day they offered £2 million inclusive of costs but exclusive of Court of Protection costs (an odd form of offer).

4. My instructing solicitor and I agreed that the fundamental issue was whether the judge would decide that the Claimant's wife would remain with her husband. We both felt that the judge may well, or probably would, find that she would. If the judge were to come to that conclusion, it would reduce the claim by over half a million pounds. That being so, I advised that the offer should be accepted. In giving that advice I was helped and guided by my instructing solicitor's detailed knowledge of the history of this family, and her informed opinion on the issue whether Mrs W*** will continue to live with and care for her husband. My instructing solicitor then negotiated a further offer of £2.1 million, all inclusive, which I again advised should be accepted.

5. No specific figures were agreed by the Defendants, but I set out below the sums which we felt were acceptable for each head of damage.

1. Past Loss of Earnings

21.9.94 - 1.1.95, net loss £165.72 per week x 14 weeks: £2,320.00

21.1.95 - 1.4.95, net loss £172.86 per week x 13 weeks: £2,247.00

2.4.95 - 1.1.96, net loss £173.51 per week x 34 weeks: £5,899.00

1.1.96/97 using comparator earnings: £12,299.00

97/98: £12,369.00

98/99: £10,246.00

99/00, uplifted 3%: £10,553.00

2000 - 6.6.2000, uplift 3%, £10,870.00 p.a., £29.70 per day x 157 days:

£4,663.00

Total: £60,596.00

The Defendants offered £58,000, which was so close to our figure that I felt it should be agreed.

*****

2. Past Care

See the reports of Maggie Sargent and Caroline Ferber.

(a) Care provided by partner

See Maggie Sargent Schedules 1-6

Schedules 1-5 total: £59,880.86

Schedule 6, 84 hours per week at £4.98 per hour, £21,752.64 per annum or £59.59 per day x 289 days from 21.8.99-6.6.2000: £17,223.32

Sub-total: £77,104.18

75% thereof: £57,828.00

The Defendants' figure was £46,000 - there is no certainty in the number of hours spent, so I suggested £50,000.

(b) Professional care provided by Nightingales/BNA.

1997 invoices 002194-006239: £10,944.23

1998 invoices 006422-008934: £6,782.44

1999 invoices 010313-013329: £9,695.77

Sub-total: £27,422.00

Agreed.

(c) Professional care provided by Elm Park - in-patient care.

30.7.98 - 30.11.98 invoices EP98117-98174: £39,680.00

Defendants £39,000 - agreed.

(d) Brain Injury Case Management costs provided by Rehabilitation Without Walls.

10.2.97-22.1.98 invoices 0302-1114: £23,591.00

Agreed.

(e) Anglia Case Management Costs.

2.8.99 invoice C632: £2,6140.00

Agreed.

(f) Physiotherapy costs.

February - June of 1998: £2,387.00

March - June 1999: £903.00

Sub-total: £3,291.00

Agreed.

Therefore past care costs: £177,952.00

Defendants £138,921 - our revised figure £146,000.

*****

3. Past Accommodation

On 31.1.97 the Claimant purchased a house for £100,000.00.

Roberts v Johnstone Calculation:

£100,000.00 less sale price of previous property, £39,500.00, £60,500.00 x 3%, £1,815.00 x 3 years 126 days: £6,072.00

Additional costs:

Decoration of Claimant's sitting room, furnishings and carpets: £2,250.00

£8,000.

*****

4. Past Travel

See previous Schedule prepared by Solicitors to 27.11.99.

The cost of public transport, taxis and car journeys.

1994 to date: £4,356.00

Agreed

*****

5. Past Miscellaneous Expenditure

(a) Transport expenses:

(i) Partner's driving lessons: £360.00

(ii) Taxis from August 1995 to November 1995, £70.00 per week x 17:

£1,190.00

(iii) Motability deposit on Ford Escort: £225.00

(iv) Insurance for third person on two vehicles: £250.00

Sub-total: £2,025.00

Agreed.

(b) Equipment:

(i) Carters Cruiser Powered wheelchair: £2,445.00

(ii) Bathmaster bathing aid: £5,912.60

Agreed subject to proof of purchase.

(c) Past Heating Costs:

January 1996 to date, cost to November 1999 at the rate of £7.12 per week:

£1,755.00

From November 1999 to trial date £9.00 per week x 30 weeks:

£270.0

Agreed at £2,000.

(d) Laundry:

See page 36 of the OT report: £80.00

Agreed.

(e) Gardening costs: £208.00

Agreed.

Therefore past miscellaneous costs: £12,696.00

Defendants £9,085 - our revised figure £10,225.



SUMMARY OF PAST LOSSES

1. Past loss of earnings: £58,000

2. Past care: £146,000

3. Past accommodation: £8,000

4. Past travel: £4,356

5. Past miscellaneous: £10,225

£226,581

Interest

Half SIA interest is claimed from date of accident to date of trial, 22.82%:

£51,705

Credit will be allowed for interim payments received (£66,615)

Gross past losses subject to interest on both sides:

£226,581

6. Future Loss of Earnings

Life expectancy is to age 58

From age 31 using Table 13, a 3% multiplier is 20.86 discounted for contingencies by .95 to 19.8

20.86 x 0.95 = 19.8 x £10,870 = £215,226 - say £200,000

Defendants' figure was £182,000 - calculated using the method of calculating lost years set out in Kemp, with which, ironically, I disagree.

The Claimant has no earning capacity.

*****

7. Future Care

The care claim was put on the basis that care will be professionally provided, which was less likely if the Claimant's wife remained with him. Future care costings were as calculated by Caroline Ferber, as supported by Maggie Sargent, subject to a modest discount to reflect the contingency nature of "waking nights" care, therefore the Claimant takes a mid-point between Caroline Ferber's costings of £90,315.00 per annum and Maggie Sargent's costings of £83,979.00 = £87,147.

Man of 51 (assuming 20 lost years) = 18.63, say 18.6 - using a multiplier of 4 (first 5 years) x £20,000 (estimated value of combined and professional care whilst Mrs W*** is still living with her husband) = £80,000; then balance at 14.6 x £84,000 (Maggie Sargent's figure) = £1,226,440; total £1,310,400. I felt that a discount down to £1,200,000 was modest. The Defendant's figure was £502,000. This was obviously the area of real dispute, with £700,000 at stake. We had Maggie Sargent and Caroline Ferber, both of whom I know, the former very well. I felt that they were the perfect pairing, combining an independent assessment by a practising care organiser and case manager, with the detailed knowledge of the current case manager. The defence expert was a woman of whom I had not heard, but who worked for a respectable (slightly defence orientated, in my opinion) organisation, the head of which is experienced in court work. We had to make a judgment as to the probable result of a court contest, and my opinion was that our experts should prevail. Having said that, there is no absolutely right answer in these care issues, and the real worry was whether the professional system would be needed, or not. As can be seen, I costed on the basis that Mrs W*** would be available for only 5 years, and that she would then feel compelled to leave her husband. However, one could not ignore the fact that Mrs W*** had, quite understandably, been very changeable in her views, and that she might well be cross-examined into agreeing that she would stay for life. I could see an attractive line of questioning which, if performed sympathetically, would emphasise to her that she would be able to buy in some care, get her husband out and about, giving her freedom to continue her own life, and making it tolerable and pleasurable, so that she did not feel so frustrated. If we had lost in that manner, it probably would have reduced the claim by even more than the £700,000 identified above.

****

8. Future Equipment

Costs calculated from the present day:

Capital expenditure: £9,732.00

Annual expenditure £1891

Costs from age 55 years:

Capital expenditure, £3,500.00 x accelerated receipt factor of .622: £2,177.00

Annual expenditure, £553.00 x 2% multiplier for 10 years (aged 55-65), 9.07 x accelerated receipt factor of .622: £3,120.00

Sub-total: £5,297.00

Multiplier reduced for the diminished life expectancy. Total claim £47,176.00. Because of the uncertainty always involved in equipment, I would accept £40,000.

9. Future Accommodation

Roberts v Johnstone calculation.

£60,500.00 x 3%, £1,815.00 x multiplier of 15.27 £27,715.00

Adaptation costs inclusive of professional fees estimated at £76,091.00, but there was a builder's estimate at £43,850

Increased building insurance premiums, Council Tax and Maintenance costs:

TBA

Insurance, say £200 x 15? Difference in council tax, say £200 p.a.?

Total future accommodation costs: £103,806

The defendants offered £53,000; our figure had to be adjusted to £77,000, and an offer of £70,000 would be acceptable.

*****

10. Future Transport Costs

Capital expenditure:

The Claimant requires the purchase of a Ford Mondeo Estate 2.0 GLX:

£18,000.00

A discount for the part-exchange value on the vehicle the Claimant would have run is not appropriate, as the family now need 2 cars, where one would have sufficed but for the accident. No claim is made for the second car therefore it is not appropriate to discount for the vehicle the Claimant would have run.

Annual expenditure.

The car will be renewed every 6 years and assuming a mileage of 8,000 miles, the car would depreciate to £3,095.00.

Therefore annual cost £2,485.00, allowing for a discounted multiplier to reflect replacement costs are not immediately incurred, 18 x £2,485.00 = £44,730

Sub-total: £62,730

Extra insurance.

£446.00 x 18 £10,481.00 £8,028

There is no claim for mileage expenditure as expenses ought to be met by mobility allowance.

Car adaptations.

(i) Hodge Mark II wheelchair winch: £510.00

(ii) Replacement cost £43.00 p.a. x 23.5: £1,010.00

(iii) Re-fitting winch cost to each vehicle, £15.00 p.a. x

23.5: £352.00

(iv) Rotating car seat from age 45 - 65 years, capital cost: £1,105.00

Discount for accelerated receipt by .759: £839.00

(v) Replacement costs £184.00 p.a. x 2% multiplier of

16.51 (for a 20 year period) x AR factor for 14 years

of .759: £2,305.00

Therefore total transport claim is £76,879, but there is a clear argument that there are no increased costs - this is the sort of car the family would have had in any event, and there is no increased mileage. £40,000 to £60,000.

11. Future Miscellaneous Costs

Heating at £9.00 per week: £468.00 p.a.

Laundry 58p per week: £ 30.00 p.a.

Gardening £14.00 per week x 39 weeks: £273.00 p.a.

DIY, internal and external maintenance: £907.00 p.a.

Say, decorate 1 room per year £200 and outside once every 5 years?

Sub-total: £1912.00 x 18 £30,204

OFFER £30,000

Child care until child is 14:

£4.00 x 4 hours per week x 52 weeks for 5 years using a multiplier of 4.76:

£3,960.00 £4,000

Furnishings & equipping carer's room.

Capital cost: £2,657.00

Annual cost £2,658.00 x 23.5: £6,227.00 £6,000

Therefore future miscellaneous costs: £58,732.00 £40,000

*****

12. Future Therapies/Activities

Physio: £3,705.00

Headway: £3,072.00

Sports club/gym: £480.00

All agreed by Defendant

£7,257 x 18.0 = £130,626

OFFER: £130,626

*****

13. Future Holidays

The claim proceeds on the basis that the holiday claim will be in the absence of the Claimant's partner.

£70.00 x 14 days x 2 carers plus out of pocket expenses, £20.00 x 14 days x 2 carers.

£2,520.00 x 18: £45,360

D'S OFFER IS £21,000; OFFER £40,000.

*****

14. Future Administration Costs

(a) Payroll costs for future care - £19.00 per month plus VAT, plus year end costs of £25.00 plus VAT

£298.00 x 18: £7,372.00

(c) Employer's liability insurance: £46.00

(d) External carer training costs: £400.00 p.a.

Sub-total: £517.00 p.a. x 18 = 9,306

£13,392

OFFER £10,000.

*****

15. Court of Protection Costs

The claim can only be calculated once the value of the compensation fund is known:

TBA

********************

PAIN, SUFFERING AND LOSS OF AMENITY

Pain & suffering and Court of Protection must be added. I considered that the pre - Heil figure for pain & suffering would have been £125,000, which should now be revalued to £160,000.


****
Back to Bill Braithwaite's home pageBack to Case Settlements IndexNext Case Settlement