Back to Bill Braithwaite's home pageBack to Articles Index Next Article

STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS

Structured settlements are a method by which damages can be paid by a defendant in a stream of future annual payments, rather than by the traditional lump sum award at trial. What usually happens is that the lawyers come to an agreement about the value of the claim in the usual way, and then start to investigate whether it suits both the plaintiff and the defendant for some or all of the money to be invested in an annuity so that there is a guaranteed income for the life of the plaintiff. Generally, some of the damages are used to buy accommodation and equipment, and the rest is needed for the future expenses of living, including additional care, therapies and normal household expenses. The system is quite flexible, in that the plaintiff can choose how much of his damages should be kept as capital (a contingency fund), and there are various ways in which the structured settlement can be tailored to the individual's needs. The great advantage for a plaintiff is that the income is guaranteed for life, however long that might be, subject to the financial stability of the insurance company which is used to provide the annuity, and it is usually linked to inflation. The main disadvantage seems to be that the plaintiff loses control of the money which goes into the annuity, so that, if something unforeseen happens which requires him to use part of his capital, it will not be possible. A structured settlement is not possible unless the insurance company consents: it cannot be ordered by the court in the absence of consent.

There is a good deal of controversy at the moment about whether structured settlements are, or are not, a good thing (see, for example the Law Commission's Report on Structured Settlements [Law Com No 224] 1994). Each case should be considered on its own merits, because not all are appropriate for this type of disposal: it is important to get the best advice. The decisive consideration is often security for the plaintiff and his family: when life has collapsed around you, it must be some comfort to know that you will receive a guaranteed income for life, linked to inflation.

The Law Commission made several recommendations:-

  1. There should be no judicial power to impose structured settlements.
  2. Life offices should be able to make payments under annuities bought by defendants free of tax direct to the plaintiff.
  3. There should be provision for statutory structured settlements.
  4. The position of intermediaries acting for both parties should be considered by the relevant professional bodies.

****
Back to Bill Braithwaite's home pageBack to Articles Index Next Article